<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jessesword.com/fword/faq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jessesword.com/fword</link>
	<description>The Complete History of the Word. Yes, That One.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:46:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Sheidlower</title>
		<link>http://www.jessesword.com/fword/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Sheidlower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessesword.com/fword/?page_id=14#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I think this was an unfortunate omission. I agree that it should be in, and I&#039;m not sure why I missed it—I do have a good amount of evidence for it.

Whoops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this was an unfortunate omission. I agree that it should be in, and I&#8217;m not sure why I missed it—I do have a good amount of evidence for it.</p>
<p>Whoops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.jessesword.com/fword/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessesword.com/fword/?page_id=14#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Just finished reading (yes, reading from cover to cover) the latest edition of The F Word. Was surprised not to find JFDI as an entry, short for &#039;just fucking do it&#039;. A Google search reveals over 50,000 hits, though not necessarily all clearly having the &#039;just fucking do it&#039; meaning.

I recall my then managing director, back in the year 2000, referring to a particular IT project being &quot;a JFDI project&quot; - in other words, &quot;don&#039;t bother with the formalities - just fucking do it&quot;.

No sign of this in the online OED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished reading (yes, reading from cover to cover) the latest edition of The F Word. Was surprised not to find JFDI as an entry, short for &#8216;just fucking do it&#8217;. A Google search reveals over 50,000 hits, though not necessarily all clearly having the &#8216;just fucking do it&#8217; meaning.</p>
<p>I recall my then managing director, back in the year 2000, referring to a particular IT project being &#8220;a JFDI project&#8221; &#8211; in other words, &#8220;don&#8217;t bother with the formalities &#8211; just fucking do it&#8221;.</p>
<p>No sign of this in the online OED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Sheidlower</title>
		<link>http://www.jessesword.com/fword/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Sheidlower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessesword.com/fword/?page_id=14#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The earliest example of &lt;i&gt;clusterfuck&lt;/i&gt; is from 1965, and not in a context where linguistic influence from the Vietnam war would be likely. Not to mention that &lt;i&gt;cluster bomb&lt;/i&gt; itself isn&#039;t attested until later than 1965.

It&#039;s not unlikely that sense 2 was influenced by &lt;i&gt;cluster bomb&lt;/i&gt;, but since there wasn&#039;t any direct evidence, I didn&#039;t think it was appropriate to mention this in an etymology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The earliest example of <i>clusterfuck</i> is from 1965, and not in a context where linguistic influence from the Vietnam war would be likely. Not to mention that <i>cluster bomb</i> itself isn&#8217;t attested until later than 1965.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not unlikely that sense 2 was influenced by <i>cluster bomb</i>, but since there wasn&#8217;t any direct evidence, I didn&#8217;t think it was appropriate to mention this in an etymology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.W.Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.jessesword.com/fword/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>G.W.Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessesword.com/fword/?page_id=14#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this most illuminating work.  The &#039;clusterfuck&#039; excerpt seems incomplete to me.  I&#039;m certain that this word was a product of the Vietnam war.  That war brought new technologies into the vernacular, for example, Napalm, carpet-bombing, and of relevance here, cluster bombs.   Cluster bombs were much discussed at the time because of their novel and insidious mode of action. The term &#039;cluster bomb&#039; in the hands of the anti-war movement quickly migrated to &#039;cluster fuck&#039; as a way to express outrage at the horrendous damage caused by these weapons.  Linking one obscenity with another obscenity was a natural etymology in the 1960&#039;s to coerce awareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this most illuminating work.  The &#8216;clusterfuck&#8217; excerpt seems incomplete to me.  I&#8217;m certain that this word was a product of the Vietnam war.  That war brought new technologies into the vernacular, for example, Napalm, carpet-bombing, and of relevance here, cluster bombs.   Cluster bombs were much discussed at the time because of their novel and insidious mode of action. The term &#8216;cluster bomb&#8217; in the hands of the anti-war movement quickly migrated to &#8216;cluster fuck&#8217; as a way to express outrage at the horrendous damage caused by these weapons.  Linking one obscenity with another obscenity was a natural etymology in the 1960&#8217;s to coerce awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

